Skip to content

Update pectra-changes.mdx#1492

Merged
sbvegan merged 1 commit intomainfrom
sbvegan-patch-1
Mar 11, 2025
Merged

Update pectra-changes.mdx#1492
sbvegan merged 1 commit intomainfrom
sbvegan-patch-1

Conversation

@sbvegan
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbvegan sbvegan commented Mar 11, 2025

Description

Tests

Additional context

Metadata

@sbvegan sbvegan requested a review from a team as a code owner March 11, 2025 22:58
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 11, 2025 •
edited
Loading

✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 3789cec
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67d0c00db3f89200087a4741
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1492--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 11, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The update modifies the required version of the op-challenger binary used for fault proof enabled chains. In the file pages/notices/pectra-changes.mdx, the binary version is updated from v1.3.1 to v1.3.2. This change affects both permissionless and permissioned fault proof systems, ensuring that systems utilize the latest version of the binary, which may include bug fixes, enhancements, or new features relevant to their operation.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update challenger info #1416: Updates the op-challenger binary version, directly aligning with the modifications in this PR.
  • pectra notice #1324: Addresses changes related to the op-challenger version update, indicating a direct code-level connection.

Suggested reviewers

  • bradleycamacho
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 87f376b and 3789cec.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.mdx`: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with ...

**/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • First, check the frontmatter section at the top of the file:
    1. For regular pages, ensure ALL these fields are present and not empty:
    ---
title: [non-empty]
lang: [non-empty]
description: [non-empty]
topic: [non-empty]
personas: [non-empty array]
categories: [non-empty array]
content_type: [valid type]
---
    1. For landing pages (index.mdx or files with ), only these fields are required:
    ---
title: [non-empty]
lang: [non-empty]
description: [non-empty]
topic: [non-empty]
---
    1. If any required fields are missing or empty, comment:
      'This file appears to be missing required metadata. You can fix this by running:
    pnpm metadata-batch-cli:dry "path/to/this/file.mdx"
    Review the changes, then run without :dry to apply them.'
  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
  • pages/notices/pectra-changes.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (1)

107-107: Update op-challenger Binary Version

The op‑challenger version has been updated to v1.3.2, which aligns with the need for both permissionless and permissioned fault proof systems. Please verify that this new version has been thoroughly tested and that all dependent components are compatible with it.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sbvegan sbvegan merged commit faef26b into main Mar 11, 2025
8 checks passed
@sbvegan sbvegan deleted the sbvegan-patch-1 branch March 11, 2025 23:01
@opgitgovernance opgitgovernance mentioned this pull request Apr 1, 2025
Closed
This was referenced Jun 12, 2025
Merged
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@krofax krofax krofax approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@sbvegan @krofax